I'm not seeing any contradiction. Maybe you can point to it specifically?
Are you referring to the split fire rule? That's just providing an exception to the usual rule of movement/engagement.
The combat section (A-F) just gives a more detailed breakdown of the exchange of blows.
Also, why are you overthinking the segments/rounds terms? Its pretty clear the terms are interchangeable. There's even that one line where the rule is repeated using each term. Think of it this way; each turn is segmented into three rounds, roughly giving the player 10 seconds to act and the opponent 10 seconds to act, or 20 seconds if you think of it as simultaneous.
Are you referring to the split fire rule? That's just providing an exception to the usual rule of movement/engagement.
The combat section (A-F) just gives a more detailed breakdown of the exchange of blows.
Also, why are you overthinking the segments/rounds terms? Its pretty clear the terms are interchangeable. There's even that one line where the rule is repeated using each term. Think of it this way; each turn is segmented into three rounds, roughly giving the player 10 seconds to act and the opponent 10 seconds to act, or 20 seconds if you think of it as simultaneous.