11-28-2014, 01:20 PM
I just had an idea about both the rule set to use and other practical / editorial issues (that would be good to uniform to a standard), but it's quite a bald idea, so it's better I email it to Havard first.
PS WRT the two options, I can see that the players and the DMs will appreciate more the first one, that after all will be set in the world directly described by Dave Arneson, while the authors will appreciate more making just references to the world described by Dave Arneson, but de facto using a world that comes from their own elaboration of the previous.
As a player I'dgenerally prefer something that I can play straight in Dave Arneson's setting and that's why I initially proposed it, but I can understand that authors may feel a bit under pressure, as they probably feel that there's too much preliminary study to do.
PS WRT the two options, I can see that the players and the DMs will appreciate more the first one, that after all will be set in the world directly described by Dave Arneson, while the authors will appreciate more making just references to the world described by Dave Arneson, but de facto using a world that comes from their own elaboration of the previous.
As a player I'dgenerally prefer something that I can play straight in Dave Arneson's setting and that's why I initially proposed it, but I can understand that authors may feel a bit under pressure, as they probably feel that there's too much preliminary study to do.
He's a real Nowhere man, sitting in his Nowhere land,
making all his Nowhere plans for Nobody.
making all his Nowhere plans for Nobody.