02-08-2014, 10:24 AM
There may be some interesting stuff there, but the "put your mouse on the dot" format gives me fits. Why can't they make a regular timeline like everyone else:
date xx = something happens
date xy = something else happens
etc.
I don't know what to think about some of their dates. They claim to have been researched, but they don't seem to match up with some of the dates I've heard quoted for a long time. For example, I've heard November 1973 cited as pre-OD&D and January 1974 as first printing.
date xx = something happens
date xy = something else happens
etc.
I don't know what to think about some of their dates. They claim to have been researched, but they don't seem to match up with some of the dates I've heard quoted for a long time. For example, I've heard November 1973 cited as pre-OD&D and January 1974 as first printing.
Marv / Finarvyn
Member of The Regency Council
Visit my Blackmoor OD&D board
OD&D since 1975
"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
- Dave Arneson
![[Image: Giladan.png]](http://rizak.info/PIX/Giladan.png)
Member of The Regency Council
Visit my Blackmoor OD&D board
OD&D since 1975
"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
- Dave Arneson