06-28-2012, 09:02 AM
I thought that the first D&D movie was weak but not unwatchable as long as you forgot that it was "D&D." The characters were kind of fun, the situations were okay. It didn't feel like D&D because they couldn't bother to make magic seem like D&D.
The second movie was a lot better. The characters were neat, they did some name-dropping from classic modules, and seemed to be making an attempt to make the movie more like D&D and less generic.
I will confess to owning both on DVD.
This one seems pretty lame. The characters don't inspire me much at all. I don't like all of the piercings. It just doesn't cry "D&D" at me. :?
The second movie was a lot better. The characters were neat, they did some name-dropping from classic modules, and seemed to be making an attempt to make the movie more like D&D and less generic.
I will confess to owning both on DVD.
This one seems pretty lame. The characters don't inspire me much at all. I don't like all of the piercings. It just doesn't cry "D&D" at me. :?
Marv / Finarvyn
Member of The Regency Council
Visit my Blackmoor OD&D board
OD&D since 1975
"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
- Dave Arneson
![[Image: Giladan.png]](http://rizak.info/PIX/Giladan.png)
Member of The Regency Council
Visit my Blackmoor OD&D board
OD&D since 1975
"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
- Dave Arneson